Sweatt v. Painter : Gallery


Legal History (West Wall)

Heman Sweatt, a black man in a hat, short sleeved short and slacks, strides across a sidewalk on University of Texas at Austin campus with books under his arm. The quotation "The mind must be stimulated by productive opportunity before it can possibly develop to its highest." is superimposed on the image.

Why I Want to Attend the University of Texas” by Heman Marion Sweatt
Published in the Texas Ranger on Sept. 1947, Vol 60 No. 1 pg. 20-42. 

Dolph Briscoe Center for American History, The University of Texas, Austin, TX.

View the Essay

Photograph by Joe Scherschel, 1950, The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock (12067025a).

Heman Marion Sweatt walks across the University of Texas campus in August 1950.


Legal History of Integration in Education

The University of Texas at Austin has played a central role in the national political and legal struggles over integration in higher education.

June 5, 1950

1950
Sweatt v. Painter

Racial segregation in state-supported graduate and professional education was abolished in this decision, made simultaneously alongside the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents.

June 5, 1950
May 17, 1954

1954 & 1955
Brown v. Board of Education

This unanimous decision overturned Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) and ended racial segregation in all public schools.

May 17, 1954
June 28, 1978

1978
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke

The Supreme Court ruled that race could be considered as one of several factors in college admissions policies, but that racial quotas were impermissible.

June 28, 1978
May 20, 1996

1996
Hopwood v. Texas

The Fifth Circuit Court held that UT Law School could not use race as a factor in admissions decisions. The University appealed and lost. The Texas Legislature passed the “Top Ten Percent Rule.”

May 20, 1996
June 23, 2003

2003
Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger

The Supreme Court ruled that the Universit of Michigan’s Law School could consider race in admissions, though only as one of several factors and evaluated on an individual basis, thus abrogating Hopwood. The Court also struck down U-M’s points-based affirmative action policy in undergraduate admissions.

June 23, 2003
June 23, 2016

2013 & 2016
Fisher v. University of Texas

Edward Blum, UT alum, represented plaintiffs challenging UT’s race-conscious undergraduate admissions policy. The University prevailed and race remained a permissible factor for admissions decisons.

June 23, 2016
June 29, 2023

2023
Students for Fair Admissions, Inc v. President and Fellows of Harvard College

The consideration of race in most college admissions was declared to be unconstitutional in this Supreme Court majority 6-2 ruling. UT alum Edward Blum spearheaded this case as well.

June 29, 2023

Explore & Learn More

Thirty African Americans in business attire gather to protest state segregation on the steps of the Main Building on the campus of the University of Texas at Austin

Learn more about Heman Marion Sweatt and other key figures and their legal struggle for racial equity in higher education at UT and in the nation.

Exterior of an academic building entrance with an extended awning

Explore how the Design Process behind our site activation.